Two weeks ago Beats Electronics, the company led by Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre., announced they were starting their own music streaming service called Daisy that they will launch later this year. In a related move, Beats also made an undisclosed investment in Topspin, the online business that provides back-end digital services for musicians and labels to facilitate the direct to fan model. You can read the full article here from The LA Times.
This business play was recently the theme of serious discussion on this past week's Hypebot's Upward Spiral podcast (by the way if you are a serious musician, or serious about the music industry, you probably should be listening to this podcast). After listening to the show and reading up on the venture. Only one thought comes to mind.
You can seriously tell that the business side of the music industry is run by musicians, and that isn't necessarily a good thing.
Let me shed some light on this statement.
One of the biggest problems with most bands, is they don't give a damn about the fan, the person who pays for tickets, music, and merch; who, ultimately, puts food on the table for the artist. If they are a cover band, they normally choose songs they want to play, not what the fan wants to hear, and then they complain that nobody is showing up at their gigs. If the band is an all original unit, it is even worse. Most of the time, these groups refuse to play covers and try to force-feed their fans their own (mostly shitty) material. Then, they too, wonder why nobody shows up at their shows.
Now, before I get a million emails from bands telling me they don't do that, I must say this isn't an absolute truth, but I will guarantee it is well north of 80% of the acts out there.
And now we have Beats, run by a musician, moving into the streaming world. And they put another musician, Trent Reznor, in charge as Chief Creative Officer of the new initiative, whatever that means. No offense to Trent, he is one talented guy, and the founder of the CwF=RtB (connect with fans = reason to buy) model, but will this business venture work out with a musician in charge?
I can already see the problem with Daisy. The whole premise behind Daisy, is that it will give fans the chance to buy merchandise, tickets, and downloads direct from the artist, while they stream their favorite tunes. This doesn't appear to be a need set-fort by fans (consumer led marketing), but rather bands and labels (business to business marketing).
So here we go again. We are going to give the world another streaming service with no value proposition for the fans, but for the artists. So what is going to happen? Chances are Joe Blow the music fan won't give a shit, but Jimmy and His Big Dream Band will try, forcing Joe to change from Spotify to Daisy so he will buy concert tickets, merchandise, and music. They will send Joe emails, Twitter feeds, FaceBook Statuses, anything short of aerial cloud writing, hoping to get Joe to switch over from Spotify or Pandora, listen to their music, and hopefully impulse buy tickets.
Does this really appeal to the fan? The person who is the end consumer of the music industry?
My prediction is Daisy will show up with a big splash. It will appeal to bands and record labels, but not to fans. The service will survive with probably the same amount of users as MOG, which is around 500,000, and that will be it. Fans of music will stick to Spotify, Pandora, and iHeart and those ventures will see increased revenue.
That isn't to say the direct to streaming fan model isn't a great idea. It is so great that eventually Spotify, Pandora, and all the other streaming services will adopt Daisy's model. This will kill Beat's new business units value proposition, but will be awesome for musicians and labels. So at least some good will come of this. And for that I say thanks to Iovine, Dre, and Reznor.
No comments:
Post a Comment